PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVGM.DE achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.DE's 35.07% return.


VVGM.DE

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.63%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*

XDEV.DE

1D
-0.89%
1M
11.02%
YTD
35.07%
6M
38.05%
1Y
63.16%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
17.35%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VVGM.DE
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF
0.57%11.67%16.13%7.09%-6.16%24.82%6.99%
XDEV.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
35.07%24.76%11.62%15.67%-4.96%30.90%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VVGM.DE and XDEV.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020

0.79

The correlation between VVGM.DE and XDEV.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVGM.DE
VVGM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VVGM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEV.DE
XDEV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XDEV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVGM.DEXDEV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.81

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

10.38

-9.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

39.12

-36.96

VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVGM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the XDEV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVGM.DE and XDEV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVGM.DEXDEV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

4.52

-3.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.23

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.71

+0.01

Drawdowns

VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVGM.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.DE drawdown of -35.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVGM.DE and XDEV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVGM.DEXDEV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-35.28%

+17.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-6.05%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-18.02%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

-18.02%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-1.07%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-5.56%

+1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

1.61%

+1.85%

Volatility

VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) is 4.13%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that VVGM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVGM.DEXDEV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

5.77%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

11.20%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

13.89%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

13.96%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

15.90%

-2.18%

VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVGM.DE has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVGM.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VVGM.DE nor XDEV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VVGM.DE and XDEV.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEV.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEV.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for VVGM.DE.

VVGM.DE tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus, while XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for VVGM.DE and 0.25% for XDEV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVGM.DE and XDEV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer