PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVGM.DE achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than CBUI.DE's 20.05% return.


VVGM.DE

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.63%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*

CBUI.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
6.94%
YTD
20.05%
6M
22.25%
1Y
43.77%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VVGM.DE
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF
0.57%11.67%16.13%7.09%-6.16%2.31%
CBUI.DE
iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
20.05%20.98%13.82%15.94%-6.30%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VVGM.DE and CBUI.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2021

0.84

The correlation between VVGM.DE and CBUI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVGM.DE
VVGM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VVGM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUI.DE
CBUI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVGM.DECBUI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.60

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

6.92

-6.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

26.41

-24.26

VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVGM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVGM.DE and CBUI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVGM.DECBUI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

3.41

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.05

-0.33

Drawdowns

VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVGM.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum CBUI.DE drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVGM.DE and CBUI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVGM.DECBUI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-19.48%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-6.34%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-19.48%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-0.22%

-4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-3.23%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

1.67%

+1.79%

Volatility

VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE) at 3.73%. This indicates that VVGM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVGM.DECBUI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.73%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

9.76%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

12.88%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

14.21%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

14.21%

-0.49%

VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVGM.DE has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVGM.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VVGM.DE nor CBUI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VVGM.DE and CBUI.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUI.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUI.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for VVGM.DE.

VVGM.DE tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus, while CBUI.DE tracks MSCI World Value ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for VVGM.DE and 0.30% for CBUI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVGM.DE and CBUI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer