VVGM.DE vs. BLD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and TopBuild Corp. (BLD).

VVGM.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus. It was launched on Jul 7, 2020.

Performance

VVGM.DE vs. BLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and TopBuild Corp. (BLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VVGM.DE vs. BLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VVGM.DE VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF	-2.09%	11.67%	16.13%	7.09%	-6.16%	24.82%	6.99%
BLD TopBuild Corp.	-10.15%	18.10%	-11.32%	131.99%	-39.77%	61.10%	45.19%

Different Trading Currencies

VVGM.DE is traded in EUR, while BLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVGM.DE achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly higher than BLD's -10.15% return.

VVGM.DE

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: -5.10%
• YTD: -2.09%
• 6M: -1.23%
• 1Y: 5.70%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: —

BLD

• 1D: 4.97%
• 1M: -15.01%
• YTD: -10.15%
• 6M: -5.02%
• 1Y: 12.85%
• 3Y*: 18.46%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: 28.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VVGM.DE vs. BLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVGM.DE

VVGM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
VVGM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
VVGM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
VVGM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 21
VVGM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
VVGM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 25

BLD

BLD Risk / Return Rank: 56
BLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BLD Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BLD Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVGM.DE vs. BLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and TopBuild Corp. (BLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VVGM.DE	BLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	0.30	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	0.76	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.09	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	0.35	+0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.08	1.13	+0.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VVGM.DE vs. BLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVGM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is comparable to the BLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVGM.DE and BLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VVGM.DE	BLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	0.30	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.30	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.65	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between VVGM.DE and BLD is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VVGM.DE vs. BLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither VVGM.DE nor BLD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VVGM.DE vs. BLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVGM.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum BLD drawdown of -53.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVGM.DE and BLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	VVGM.DE	BLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.74%	-52.26%	+34.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.65%	-39.12%	+26.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.74%	-49.39%	+31.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.41%	-32.99%	+25.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-14.92%	+11.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	11.40%	-8.49%

Volatility

VVGM.DE vs. BLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) is 5.79%, while TopBuild Corp. (BLD) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that VVGM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VVGM.DE	BLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	13.75%	-7.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.54%	28.79%	-19.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.78%	42.49%	-26.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.48%	39.48%	-26.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.69%	41.80%	-28.11%