VUTA.L vs. TREI.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

VUTA.L (Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating) and TREI.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - VUTA.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index while TREI.L tracks the Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUTA.L returned -0.27%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for TREI.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUTA.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TREI.L.

Performance

VUTA.L vs. TREI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VUTA.L is traded in GBP, while TREI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TREI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUTA.L achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than TREI.L's 2.42% return.

VUTA.L

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: -0.64%
• YTD: -0.45%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 1.93%
• 5Y*: -0.27%
• 10Y*: —

TREI.L

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.38%
• 6M: 2.09%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUTA.L vs. TREI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VUTA.L Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating	-0.45%	-1.12%	2.51%	-1.91%	-1.88%	-1.09%	2.07%
TREI.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF	2.42%	-3.12%	7.01%	-0.27%	12.48%	0.92%	-3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VUTA.L and TREI.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020	0.66

The correlation between VUTA.L and TREI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VUTA.L vs. TREI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUTA.L

VUTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VUTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
VUTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 15
VUTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
VUTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

TREI.L

TREI.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
TREI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TREI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
TREI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
TREI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
TREI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUTA.L vs. TREI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VUTA.L	TREI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.64	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	0.95	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.11	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	0.83	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.22	2.27	-1.05

VUTA.L vs. TREI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the TREI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUTA.L and TREI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VUTA.L vs. TREI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUTA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.05%, which is greater than TREI.L's maximum drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUTA.L and TREI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUTA.L	TREI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.05%	-19.00%	-6.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.19%	-5.11%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.06%	-9.81%	-11.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.06%	-15.98%	-5.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.48%	-5.65%	-13.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.91%	-10.06%	-7.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	1.87%	+0.39%

Volatility

VUTA.L vs. TREI.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L) at 1.74%. This indicates that VUTA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUTA.L	TREI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.92%	1.74%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.50%	5.04%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.04%	6.59%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.62%	8.41%	+8.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	8.77%	+8.48%

VUTA.L vs. TREI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUTA.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TREI.L's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VUTA.L vs. TREI.L - Dividend Comparison

VUTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TREI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TREI.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF	3.92%	4.23%	4.98%	4.59%	1.51%	0.10%	0.69%
VUTA.L Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUTA.L and TREI.L in my portfolio?

VUTA.L and TREI.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VUTA.L or TREI.L?

On fees, VUTA.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUTA.L or TREI.L?

VUTA.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TREI.L.

What is the main difference between VUTA.L and TREI.L?

VUTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index, while TREI.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VUTA.L and 0.06% for TREI.L.