VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VUTA.L (Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating) and BBLL.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Government Bonds funds - VUTA.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index while BBLL.L tracks the ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VUTA.L returned 4.50% vs 4.96% for BBLL.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUTA.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for BBLL.L.

Performance

VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUTA.L achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than BBLL.L's 1.64% return.

VUTA.L

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 0.03%
• 6M: -0.52%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 0.21%
• 5Y*: 0.65%
• 10Y*: —

BBLL.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: 4.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VUTA.L Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.03%	2.62%
BBLL.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	1.64%	2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between VUTA.L and BBLL.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.82

The correlation between VUTA.L and BBLL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUTA.L

VUTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
VUTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
VUTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
VUTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
VUTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BBLL.L

BBLL.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
BBLL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BBLL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BBLL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BBLL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BBLL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUTA.L	BBLL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.77	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	1.15	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.13	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	1.09	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.08	2.77	-0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the BBLL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUTA.L and BBLL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUTA.L	BBLL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	0.77	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.57	-0.49

Drawdowns

VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUTA.L drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than BBLL.L's maximum drawdown of -4.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUTA.L and BBLL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUTA.L	BBLL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-4.55%	-18.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.21%	-4.55%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.49%	-1.11%	-17.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-1.59%	-13.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.79%	+0.37%

Volatility

VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) is 1.39%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that VUTA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBLL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUTA.L	BBLL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	1.86%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.40%	4.69%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.98%	6.43%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.70%	6.41%	+2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.39%	6.41%	+2.98%

VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUTA.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BBLL.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VUTA.L vs. BBLL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUTA.L nor BBLL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUTA.L and BBLL.L in my portfolio?

VUTA.L and BBLL.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VUTA.L or BBLL.L?

On fees, VUTA.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUTA.L or BBLL.L?

VUTA.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBLL.L.

What is the main difference between VUTA.L and BBLL.L?

VUTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index, while BBLL.L tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VUTA.L and 0.07% for BBLL.L.