PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUS vs. DMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUS vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF (VUS) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUS achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.


VUS

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.84%
YTD
19.93%
6M
20.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAY

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.30%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.19%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUS vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VUS and DMAY is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.84

VUS vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUS
DMAY

Technology

34.7%
36.2%

Industrials

11.5%
8.1%

Real Estate

10.4%
1.9%

Financial Services

9.5%
11.9%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.4%

Energy

6.0%
3.5%

Communication Services

5.3%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
10.1%

Utilities

3.3%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.9%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.8%

Technology

VUS
34.7%
DMAY
36.2%

Industrials

VUS
11.5%
DMAY
8.1%

Real Estate

VUS
10.4%
DMAY
1.9%

Financial Services

VUS
9.5%
DMAY
11.9%

Healthcare

VUS
8.3%
DMAY
8.4%

Energy

VUS
6.0%
DMAY
3.5%

Communication Services

VUS
5.3%
DMAY
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VUS
5.2%
DMAY
10.1%

Utilities

VUS
3.3%
DMAY
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

VUS
3.2%
DMAY
4.9%

Basic Materials

VUS
2.7%
DMAY
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUS vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUS

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUS vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF (VUS) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VUS vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUSDMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.23

0.88

+2.35

Drawdowns

VUS vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUS drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, smaller than the maximum DMAY drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUS and DMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSDMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-13.90%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.30%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-2.24%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

Volatility

VUS vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSDMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

4.73%

+9.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.63%

9.02%

+5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

8.43%

+6.20%

VUS vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUS vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

VUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


VUS and DMAY have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

VUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VUS and 0.85% for DMAY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUS and DMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer