VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO
VUN.TO (Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF) and HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUN.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index CAD, while HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUN.TO returned 15.43%/yr vs 22.59%/yr for HXQ.TO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUN.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXQ.TO.
Performance
VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUN.TO achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than HXQ.TO's 22.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VUN.TO has underperformed HXQ.TO with an annualized return of 15.43%, while HXQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.59% annualized return.
VUN.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 22.84%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 43.40%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.13%
- 10Y*
- 22.59%
VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 12.43% | 11.43% | 33.76% | 23.00% | -14.20% | 24.54% | 18.22% | 23.99% | 2.35% | 13.01% |
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 22.84% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 26.20% | 45.58% | 32.26% | 6.71% | 23.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUN.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between VUN.TO and HXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Financial Services
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Healthcare
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Industrials
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Communication Services
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Energy
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Utilities
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Real Estate
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Basic Materials
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VUN.TO
HXQ.TO
VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUN.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.49 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.51 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | 11.28 | +1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUN.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.80 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 1.09 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 1.08 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum HXQ.TO drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUN.TO and HXQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUN.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -31.60% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -12.43% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.88% | -22.58% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.67% | -31.60% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.19% | -31.60% | +3.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -5.75% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 3.86% | -1.59% |
Volatility
VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) is 3.04%, while Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that VUN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUN.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 4.63% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 11.81% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.97% | 15.62% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 20.76% | -5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 20.83% | -4.13% |
VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUN.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUN.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 1.10% | 1.21% | 0.97% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUN.TO and HXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUN.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUN.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
VUN.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HXQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. VUN.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index CAD, while HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Horizons. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VUN.TO and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for VUN.TO and HXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer