PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUKG.L vs. WENS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUKG.L vs. WENS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUKG.L achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than WENS.L's 31.38% return.


VUKG.L

1D
0.38%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
5.56%
6M
8.50%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*

WENS.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.54%
YTD
31.38%
6M
26.25%
1Y
44.78%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUKG.L vs. WENS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VUKG.L
Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating
5.56%26.12%9.40%7.20%6.19%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
31.38%3.24%2.09%-2.00%17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VUKG.L and WENS.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022

0.34

The correlation between VUKG.L and WENS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUKG.L vs. WENS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUKG.L
VUKG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VUKG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUKG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUKG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VUKG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUKG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

WENS.L
WENS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WENS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WENS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
WENS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WENS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
WENS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUKG.L vs. WENS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUKG.LWENS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.99

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

9.66

-1.70

VUKG.L vs. WENS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUKG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the WENS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUKG.L and WENS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUKG.LWENS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.06

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.59

-0.03

Drawdowns

VUKG.L vs. WENS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUKG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.32%, which is greater than WENS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUKG.L and WENS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUKG.LWENS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.32%

-22.49%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-14.63%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-22.49%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.16%

-7.62%

+3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-9.15%

+4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

4.54%

-1.90%

Volatility

VUKG.L vs. WENS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) is 3.86%, while iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that VUKG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WENS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUKG.LWENS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

7.96%

-4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

18.19%

-8.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

21.33%

-10.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.75%

21.49%

-8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

21.49%

-5.36%

VUKG.L vs. WENS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUKG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than WENS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUKG.L vs. WENS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUKG.L nor WENS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
VUKG.L
Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.75%3.61%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUKG.L and WENS.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUKG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUKG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.

VUKG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while WENS.L is Energy Equities. VUKG.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VUKG.L and 0.25% for WENS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUKG.L and WENS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer