VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L
VUKG.L (Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating) and VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - VUKG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUKG.L returned 11.75%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for VUAA.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUKG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAA.L.
Performance
VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUKG.L is traded in GBP, while VUAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VUAA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUKG.L achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than VUAA.L's 10.72% return.
VUKG.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 21.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
VUAA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- —
VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUKG.L Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 5.56% | 26.12% | 9.40% | 7.20% | 5.51% | 17.39% | -11.57% | 5.73% |
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.76% | 9.01% | 27.46% | 20.35% | -8.96% | 30.57% | 14.21% | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUKG.L and VUAA.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between VUKG.L and VUAA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Consumer Defensive
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Industrials
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Healthcare
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Energy
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Basic Materials
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Utilities
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Consumer Cyclical
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Communication Services
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Real Estate
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Technology
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUKG.L
VUAA.L
VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUKG.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.45 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 3.99 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | 13.50 | -5.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUKG.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.42 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.97 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.89 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUKG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.32%, which is greater than VUAA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUKG.L and VUAA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUKG.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.32% | -26.15% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -7.23% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | -21.12% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.03% | -21.12% | +8.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.16% | -0.28% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -3.69% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.14% | +0.50% |
Volatility
VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) at 3.52%. This indicates that VUKG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUKG.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 3.52% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 8.64% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 11.95% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 15.41% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 17.14% | -1.01% |
VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUKG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUKG.L vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VUKG.L nor VUAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VUKG.L and VUAA.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VUKG.L.
VUKG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. VUKG.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VUKG.L and 0.07% for VUAA.L.
Find the right allocation for VUKG.L and VUAA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer