PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUCP.L is traded in GBP, while XYLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XYLD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUCP.L achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD.L's 1.12% return.


VUCP.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.42%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
1.87%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.70%

XYLD.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.16%
YTD
1.12%
6M
0.44%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
2.55%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VUCP.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
0.04%-0.91%4.32%1.29%-5.38%-0.63%4.96%10.22%8.03%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
1.12%-1.37%6.73%0.47%2.15%1.31%7.05%12.73%7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between VUCP.L and XYLD.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2018

0.74

The correlation between VUCP.L and XYLD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUCP.L
VUCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD.L
XYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUCP.LXYLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.14

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.02

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

2.88

-0.44

VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUCP.L and XYLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUCP.LXYLD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.81

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.36

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.49

-0.21

Drawdowns

VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUCP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, which is greater than XYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUCP.L and XYLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUCP.LXYLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-15.48%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-5.03%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.00%

-8.74%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.14%

-15.48%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.67%

-4.15%

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-5.22%

-2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.79%

+0.42%

Volatility

VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L) at 1.51%. This indicates that VUCP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUCP.LXYLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.51%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

4.86%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.99%

6.35%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.51%

8.28%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.92%

9.30%

+0.62%

VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUCP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD.L's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUCP.L vs. XYLD.L - Dividend Comparison

VUCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than XYLD.L's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
VUCP.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
3.85%4.02%4.73%3.57%2.79%1.85%2.36%2.64%2.58%2.57%1.73%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
3.76%3.61%3.34%2.88%6.03%3.88%3.78%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUCP.L and XYLD.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUCP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUCP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XYLD.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VUCP.L and 0.16% for XYLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUCP.L and XYLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer