PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUCP.L achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than IBTS.L's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VUCP.L has outperformed IBTS.L with an annualized return of 2.70%, while IBTS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.


VUCP.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.42%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
1.87%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.70%

IBTS.L

1D
0.14%
1M
1.13%
YTD
0.65%
6M
0.29%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
1.53%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUCP.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
0.04%-0.91%4.32%1.29%-5.38%-0.63%4.96%10.22%2.22%-3.67%
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
0.65%-1.91%5.79%-1.41%7.61%0.64%-0.34%0.37%7.21%-8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VUCP.L and IBTS.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2016

0.81

The correlation between VUCP.L and IBTS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUCP.L
VUCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTS.L
IBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUCP.LIBTS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

0.99

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

2.51

-0.08

VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUCP.L and IBTS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUCP.LIBTS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.73

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.36

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.27

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.35

-0.08

Drawdowns

VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUCP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, smaller than the maximum IBTS.L drawdown of -19.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUCP.L and IBTS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUCP.LIBTS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-19.02%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-4.51%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.00%

-8.89%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.14%

-16.28%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.84%

-19.02%

+2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.67%

-7.51%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-7.93%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.78%

+0.43%

Volatility

VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) have volatilities of 1.62% and 1.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUCP.LIBTS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.67%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

4.49%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.99%

6.09%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.51%

8.09%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.92%

9.24%

+0.68%

VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUCP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTS.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUCP.L vs. IBTS.L - Dividend Comparison

VUCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than IBTS.L's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
3.99%4.22%4.12%3.08%0.75%0.61%1.84%2.39%1.49%1.01%0.67%0.49%
VUCP.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
3.85%4.02%4.73%3.57%2.79%1.85%2.36%2.64%2.58%2.57%1.73%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUCP.L and IBTS.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VUCP.L.

VUCP.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IBTS.L is Government Bonds. VUCP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VUCP.L and 0.07% for IBTS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUCP.L and IBTS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer