PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUAG.L is traded in GBP, while XDW0.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDW0.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAG.L achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.L's 31.44% return.


VUAG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
4.52%
YTD
10.56%
6M
9.91%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*

XDW0.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
31.44%
6M
27.91%
1Y
48.84%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
10.56%9.36%27.33%19.67%-8.88%30.97%201.05%9.30%
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
31.40%6.49%3.89%-1.50%63.67%40.54%-32.44%-5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAG.L and XDW0.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.38

The correlation between VUAG.L and XDW0.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUAG.L
XDW0.L

Technology

35.7%

-

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Communication Services

11.3%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
99.9%

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VUAG.L
35.7%
XDW0.L

-

Financial Services

VUAG.L
11.6%
XDW0.L

-

Communication Services

VUAG.L
11.3%
XDW0.L
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VUAG.L
10.2%
XDW0.L

-

Healthcare

VUAG.L
8.5%
XDW0.L

-

Industrials

VUAG.L
8.3%
XDW0.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VUAG.L
4.9%
XDW0.L

-

Energy

VUAG.L
3.5%
XDW0.L
99.9%

Utilities

VUAG.L
2.4%
XDW0.L

-

Real Estate

VUAG.L
1.9%
XDW0.L

-

Basic Materials

VUAG.L
1.8%
XDW0.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUAG.LXDW0.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.42

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

3.40

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

10.88

+4.09

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAG.L and XDW0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUAG.LXDW0.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.39

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.86

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.42

+0.47

Drawdowns

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.L drawdown of -59.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAG.L and XDW0.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAG.LXDW0.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.61%

-59.07%

+33.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-14.30%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.88%

-21.61%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.88%

-22.02%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-7.68%

+7.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-13.88%

+10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

4.48%

-2.54%

Volatility

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) is 2.62%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that VUAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAG.LXDW0.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

7.80%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

17.20%

-10.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

20.41%

-9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

23.73%

-9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.09%

25.59%

+10.50%

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAG.L vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAG.L nor XDW0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.39%
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUAG.L and XDW0.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.L.

VUAG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XDW0.L is Energy Equities. VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAG.L and 0.25% for XDW0.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAG.L and XDW0.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer