VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L
VUAG.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUAG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAG.L returned 14.39%/yr vs 28.29%/yr for X7PP.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUAG.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for X7PP.L.
Performance
VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUAG.L is traded in GBP, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUAG.L achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly higher than X7PP.L's 7.48% return.
VUAG.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 8.79%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.39%
- 10Y*
- —
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 46.89%
- 3Y*
- 43.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 8.79% | 9.36% | 27.34% | 19.65% | -8.87% | 30.97% | 16.23% | -12.98% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 7.48% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 5.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUAG.L and X7PP.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019 | 0.43 |
The correlation between VUAG.L and X7PP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Financial Services
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
Communication Services
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Healthcare
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Industrials
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Energy
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Utilities
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Real Estate
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Basic Materials
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUAG.L
X7PP.L
VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUAG.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.33 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 2.79 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.20 | 9.30 | +3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAG.L and X7PP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUAG.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.82% | -56.28% | +25.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -15.94% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.88% | -18.17% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.88% | -30.79% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | 0.00% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -15.39% | +9.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 4.79% | -2.81% |
Volatility
VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) is 3.57%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that VUAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUAG.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 6.12% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 18.15% | -10.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.90% | 22.12% | -11.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 23.54% | -9.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 24.57% | -6.69% |
VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUAG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUAG.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VUAG.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.80% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUAG.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
VUAG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAG.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.
Find the right allocation for VUAG.L and X7PP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer