VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VUAG.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VUAG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VJPB.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAG.L returned 14.93%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for VJPB.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUAG.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPB.L.

Performance

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAG.L achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than VJPB.L's 16.20% return.

VUAG.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 29.04%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 14.93%
• 10Y*: —

VJPB.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.87%
• YTD: 16.20%
• 6M: 15.77%
• 1Y: 35.07%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	10.56%	9.36%	27.33%	19.67%	-8.88%	30.97%	201.05%	2.08%
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	16.20%	17.98%	8.49%	13.45%	-6.28%	1.76%	12.11%	-2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAG.L and VJPB.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.56

The correlation between VUAG.L and VJPB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUAG.L	VJPB.L
Technology	35.7%	17.4%
Financial Services	11.6%	15.9%
Communication Services	11.3%	7.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	12.8%
Healthcare	8.5%	5.9%
Industrials	8.3%	26.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.2%
Energy	3.5%	1.0%
Utilities	2.4%	1.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	3.4%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.3%

Return for Risk

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAG.L

VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

VJPB.L

VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUAG.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	1.91	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	2.70	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.36	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	3.16	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.96	10.23	+4.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAG.L and VJPB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUAG.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	1.91	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	0.65	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.53	+0.36

Drawdowns

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, roughly equal to the maximum VJPB.L drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAG.L and VJPB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUAG.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.61%	-24.65%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.11%	-10.67%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.88%	-13.60%	-7.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.88%	-18.32%	-2.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.19%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-5.34%	+1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	3.31%	-1.37%

Volatility

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) is 2.62%, while Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that VUAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VJPB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUAG.L	VJPB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	3.88%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.17%	14.42%	-7.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	17.70%	-7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.32%	15.47%	-1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.09%	16.69%	+19.40%

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPB.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VUAG.L vs. VJPB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAG.L nor VJPB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	71.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUAG.L and VJPB.L in my portfolio?

VUAG.L and VJPB.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VUAG.L or VJPB.L?

On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUAG.L or VJPB.L?

VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPB.L.

What is the main difference between VUAG.L and VJPB.L?

VUAG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VJPB.L is Japan Equities. VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAG.L and 0.15% for VJPB.L.