PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUAG.L is traded in GBP, while QDV5.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDV5.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAG.L achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than QDV5.DE's -12.45% return.


VUAG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
4.52%
YTD
10.56%
6M
9.91%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*

QDV5.DE

1D
1.28%
1M
-4.16%
YTD
-12.45%
6M
-14.07%
1Y
-12.11%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
10.56%9.36%27.33%19.67%-8.88%30.97%201.05%9.30%
QDV5.DE
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-12.45%-3.17%10.53%12.62%3.64%25.47%9.31%3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAG.L and QDV5.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

QDV5.DE
QDV5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
QDV5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDV5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDV5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
QDV5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDV5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUAG.LQDV5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

0.90

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

-0.56

+4.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

-1.27

+16.23

VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the QDV5.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAG.L and QDV5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUAG.LQDV5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

-0.71

+3.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.27

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.29

+0.60

Drawdowns

VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, smaller than the maximum QDV5.DE drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAG.L and QDV5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAG.LQDV5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.61%

-37.18%

+11.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-20.35%

+13.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.88%

-25.08%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.88%

-25.08%

+4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-21.95%

+21.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-7.80%

+4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

9.02%

-7.08%

Volatility

VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) is 2.62%, while iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that VUAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDV5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAG.LQDV5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

6.11%

-3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

13.68%

-6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

16.09%

-5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

16.33%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.09%

21.35%

+14.74%

VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QDV5.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUAG.L vs. QDV5.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAG.L nor QDV5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QDV5.DE
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUAG.L and QDV5.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QDV5.DE.

VUAG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while QDV5.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while QDV5.DE tracks MSCI India. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAG.L and 0.65% for QDV5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAG.L and QDV5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer