VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L
VUAG.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and BYBG.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) are both S&P 500 funds - VUAG.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while BYBG.L tracks the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAG.L returned 14.93%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for BYBG.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUAG.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BYBG.L.
Performance
VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUAG.L is traded in GBP, while BYBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BYBG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUAG.L achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than BYBG.L's 8.46% return.
VUAG.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- —
BYBG.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 10.56% | 9.36% | 27.33% | 19.67% | -8.88% | 30.97% | 201.05% | 9.30% |
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 8.46% | 9.41% | 15.83% | 9.58% | -1.29% | 35.95% | 1.99% | 8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUAG.L and BYBG.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VUAG.L and BYBG.L has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Financial Services
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Communication Services
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Healthcare
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Industrials
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Consumer Defensive
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Energy
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Utilities
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Real Estate
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
-
Basic Materials
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUAG.L
BYBG.L
VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUAG.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.38 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 4.88 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.96 | 13.84 | +1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUAG.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.15 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.75 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.68 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, smaller than the maximum BYBG.L drawdown of -35.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAG.L and BYBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUAG.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.61% | -35.57% | +9.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -4.86% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.88% | -20.63% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.88% | -20.63% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -4.68% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.72% | +0.22% |
Volatility
VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUAG.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.72% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 7.49% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 11.02% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 15.15% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.09% | 18.02% | +18.07% |
VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUAG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BYBG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUAG.L vs. BYBG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VUAG.L nor BYBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUAG.L and BYBG.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BYBG.L.
VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while BYBG.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAG.L and 0.15% for BYBG.L.
Find the right allocation for VUAG.L and BYBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer