VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L
VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return, while XLEP.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAA.L returned 13.71%/yr vs 20.03%/yr for XLEP.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUAA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLEP.L.
Performance
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUAA.L is traded in USD, while XLEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLEP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than XLEP.L's 31.09% return.
VUAA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 31.09%
- 6M
- 29.31%
- 1Y
- 45.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.32% | 17.37% | 25.27% | 26.68% | -18.63% | 29.34% | 17.66% | 12.72% |
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.09% | 9.06% | 3.10% | -0.06% | 62.03% | 52.43% | -33.02% | -1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUAA.L and XLEP.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.36 |
The correlation between VUAA.L and XLEP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Financial Services
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Communication Services
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Healthcare
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Industrials
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Energy
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
Utilities
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Real Estate
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Basic Materials
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUAA.L
XLEP.L
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUAA.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.34 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.24 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 10.35 | +4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUAA.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.03 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.74 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.16 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, smaller than the maximum XLEP.L drawdown of -72.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and XLEP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUAA.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.05% | -72.31% | +38.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -14.11% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -21.12% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.36% | -28.27% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -6.43% | +5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -22.81% | +17.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 4.43% | -2.52% |
Volatility
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) is 3.18%, while Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that VUAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUAA.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 8.57% | -5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 19.38% | -10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 22.67% | -10.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 26.87% | -10.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 28.91% | -11.13% |
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLEP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VUAA.L nor XLEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VUAA.L and XLEP.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLEP.L.
VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLEP.L is Energy Equities. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.14% for XLEP.L.
Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and XLEP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer