PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUAA.L is traded in USD, while XLEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLEP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than XLEP.L's 31.09% return.


VUAA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.32%
6M
11.14%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*

XLEP.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
31.09%
6M
29.31%
1Y
45.98%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
20.03%
10Y*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
10.32%17.37%25.27%26.68%-18.63%29.34%17.66%12.72%
XLEP.L
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF
31.09%9.06%3.10%-0.06%62.03%52.43%-33.02%-1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAA.L and XLEP.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.36

The correlation between VUAA.L and XLEP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUAA.L
XLEP.L

Technology

35.7%

-

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
100.0%

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VUAA.L
35.7%
XLEP.L

-

Financial Services

VUAA.L
11.6%
XLEP.L

-

Communication Services

VUAA.L
11.3%
XLEP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

VUAA.L
10.2%
XLEP.L

-

Healthcare

VUAA.L
8.5%
XLEP.L

-

Industrials

VUAA.L
8.3%
XLEP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VUAA.L
4.9%
XLEP.L

-

Energy

VUAA.L
3.5%
XLEP.L
100.0%

Utilities

VUAA.L
2.4%
XLEP.L

-

Real Estate

VUAA.L
1.9%
XLEP.L

-

Basic Materials

VUAA.L
1.8%
XLEP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAA.L
VUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XLEP.L
XLEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUAA.LXLEP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.24

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

10.35

+4.17

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAA.L and XLEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUAA.LXLEP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.03

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.74

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.16

+0.74

Drawdowns

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, smaller than the maximum XLEP.L drawdown of -72.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and XLEP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAA.LXLEP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.05%

-72.31%

+38.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-14.11%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-21.12%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

-28.27%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-6.43%

+5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-22.81%

+17.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

4.43%

-2.52%

Volatility

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) is 3.18%, while Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that VUAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAA.LXLEP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

8.57%

-5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

19.38%

-10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

22.67%

-10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

26.87%

-10.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

28.91%

-11.13%

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLEP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAA.L vs. XLEP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAA.L nor XLEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VUAA.L and XLEP.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLEP.L.

VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLEP.L is Energy Equities. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.14% for XLEP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and XLEP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer