PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUAA.L is traded in USD, while XDPP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XDPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VUAA.L having a 10.32% return and XDPP.L slightly lower at 10.30%.


VUAA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.32%
6M
11.14%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*

XDPP.L

1D
0.05%
1M
4.60%
YTD
10.30%
6M
11.30%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
10.32%17.37%25.27%26.68%2.49%
XDPP.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C
10.30%17.70%25.14%26.13%1.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAA.L and XDPP.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022

0.92

The correlation between VUAA.L and XDPP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAA.L
VUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XDPP.L
XDPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUAA.LXDPP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.13

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

13.65

+0.87

VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAA.L and XDPP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUAA.LXDPP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.52

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.37

-0.47

Drawdowns

VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, which is greater than XDPP.L's maximum drawdown of -18.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and XDPP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAA.LXDPP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.05%

-18.99%

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-8.88%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-18.99%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.55%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-2.94%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.04%

-0.13%

Volatility

VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) at 2.56%. This indicates that VUAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAA.LXDPP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.56%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

7.95%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

11.04%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

14.83%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

14.83%

+2.95%

VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XDPP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAA.L vs. XDPP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAA.L nor XDPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VUAA.L and XDPP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDPP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDPP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VUAA.L.

VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while XDPP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.06% for XDPP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and XDPP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer