VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L
VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and VUKG.L (Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return, while VUKG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAA.L returned 13.71%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for VUKG.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUAA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VUKG.L.
Performance
VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUAA.L is traded in USD, while VUKG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUKG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly higher than VUKG.L's 5.30% return.
VUAA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- —
VUKG.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 19.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.32% | 17.37% | 25.27% | 26.68% | -18.63% | 29.34% | 17.66% | 12.72% |
VUKG.L Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 5.30% | 35.64% | 7.57% | 12.85% | -5.77% | 16.32% | -8.86% | 9.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUAA.L and VUKG.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VUAA.L and VUKG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Financial Services
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Communication Services
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Healthcare
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Industrials
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Consumer Defensive
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Energy
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Utilities
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Real Estate
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Basic Materials
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUAA.L
VUKG.L
VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUAA.L | VUKG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.05 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 6.88 | +7.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUAA.L | VUKG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 1.50 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.64 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.50 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, smaller than the maximum VUKG.L drawdown of -42.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and VUKG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUAA.L | VUKG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.05% | -42.13% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -9.68% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -13.79% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.36% | -25.65% | +1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -4.57% | +4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -6.05% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.89% | -0.98% |
Volatility
VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) is 3.18%, while Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that VUAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUKG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUAA.L | VUKG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 4.93% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 11.14% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 13.24% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 16.49% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 19.36% | -1.58% |
VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VUKG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUAA.L vs. VUKG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VUAA.L nor VUKG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VUAA.L and VUKG.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VUKG.L.
VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VUKG.L is Europe Equities. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while VUKG.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.09% for VUKG.L.
Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and VUKG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer