PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUAA.L is traded in USD, while VHVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VHVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than VHVG.L's 11.54% return.


VUAA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.32%
6M
11.14%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*

VHVG.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.62%
YTD
11.54%
6M
13.10%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
12.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
10.32%17.37%25.27%26.68%-18.63%29.34%17.66%8.98%
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
11.54%22.44%17.99%23.74%-18.23%21.91%16.01%9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAA.L and VHVG.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.90

The correlation between VUAA.L and VHVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUAA.L
VHVG.L

Technology

35.7%
29.0%

Financial Services

11.6%
15.6%

Communication Services

11.3%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.5%

Industrials

8.3%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.1%

Energy

3.5%
4.1%

Utilities

2.4%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.4%

Technology

VUAA.L
35.7%
VHVG.L
29.0%

Financial Services

VUAA.L
11.6%
VHVG.L
15.6%

Communication Services

VUAA.L
11.3%
VHVG.L
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VUAA.L
10.2%
VHVG.L
9.3%

Healthcare

VUAA.L
8.5%
VHVG.L
8.5%

Industrials

VUAA.L
8.3%
VHVG.L
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

VUAA.L
4.9%
VHVG.L
5.1%

Energy

VUAA.L
3.5%
VHVG.L
4.1%

Utilities

VUAA.L
2.4%
VHVG.L
2.6%

Real Estate

VUAA.L
1.9%
VHVG.L
2.0%

Basic Materials

VUAA.L
1.8%
VHVG.L
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAA.L
VUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VHVG.L
VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUAA.LVHVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.22

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

14.29

+0.23

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAA.L and VHVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUAA.LVHVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.46

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.80

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.87

+0.04

Drawdowns

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, roughly equal to the maximum VHVG.L drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and VHVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAA.LVHVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.05%

-33.49%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-8.84%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-16.23%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

-26.74%

+2.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.67%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-5.38%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.00%

-0.09%

Volatility

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAA.LVHVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.20%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

8.86%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

11.57%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

15.06%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

17.07%

+0.71%

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAA.L nor VHVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VUAA.L and VHVG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VHVG.L.

VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VHVG.L is Global Equities. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.12% for VHVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and VHVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer