VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L
VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and VHVG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return, while VHVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAA.L returned 13.71%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for VHVG.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUAA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VHVG.L.
Performance
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUAA.L is traded in USD, while VHVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VHVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than VHVG.L's 11.54% return.
VUAA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- —
VHVG.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- —
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.32% | 17.37% | 25.27% | 26.68% | -18.63% | 29.34% | 17.66% | 8.98% |
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc | 11.54% | 22.44% | 17.99% | 23.74% | -18.23% | 21.91% | 16.01% | 9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUAA.L and VHVG.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VUAA.L and VHVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Financial Services
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Communication Services
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Healthcare
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Industrials
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Consumer Defensive
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Energy
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Utilities
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Real Estate
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Basic Materials
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUAA.L
VHVG.L
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUAA.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.22 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 14.29 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUAA.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.46 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.80 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.87 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, roughly equal to the maximum VHVG.L drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and VHVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUAA.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.05% | -33.49% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -8.84% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -16.23% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.36% | -26.74% | +2.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.67% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -5.38% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.00% | -0.09% |
Volatility
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUAA.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.20% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 8.86% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 11.57% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 15.06% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 17.07% | +0.71% |
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUAA.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VUAA.L nor VHVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, VUAA.L and VHVG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VHVG.L.
VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VHVG.L is Global Equities. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.12% for VHVG.L.
Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and VHVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer