VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - VUAA.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Total Return while PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAA.L returned 13.71%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for PQVM.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUAA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.

Performance

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than PQVM.L's 16.65% return.

VUAA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 11.14%
• 1Y: 27.80%
• 3Y*: 22.16%
• 5Y*: 13.71%
• 10Y*: —

PQVM.L

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 16.65%
• 6M: 17.79%
• 1Y: 22.76%
• 3Y*: 24.37%
• 5Y*: 15.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	10.32%	17.37%	25.27%	26.68%	-18.63%	29.34%	17.66%	12.72%
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	16.65%	13.66%	30.17%	6.82%	0.52%	26.13%	8.05%	11.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAA.L and PQVM.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019	0.84

The correlation between VUAA.L and PQVM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUAA.L	PQVM.L
Technology	35.7%	25.6%
Financial Services	11.6%	22.0%
Communication Services	11.3%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	4.2%
Healthcare	8.5%	9.4%
Industrials	8.3%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.5%
Energy	3.5%	5.6%
Utilities	2.4%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	2.2%

Return for Risk

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAA.L

VUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
VUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
VUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
VUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

PQVM.L

PQVM.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PQVM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PQVM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
PQVM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PQVM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUAA.L	PQVM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.06	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	3.15	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.37	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	4.70	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.52	16.26	-1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAA.L and PQVM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUAA.L	PQVM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.06	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.96	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.87	+0.03

Drawdowns

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, roughly equal to the maximum PQVM.L drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and PQVM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUAA.L	PQVM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.05%	-34.42%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.18%	-4.83%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.39%	-15.49%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.36%	-17.35%	-7.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	0.00%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-3.90%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	1.40%	+0.51%

Volatility

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUAA.L	PQVM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	3.15%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.57%	8.76%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.69%	11.01%	+0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	16.13%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.78%	17.13%	+0.65%

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUAA.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison

VUAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	0.77%	0.82%	0.84%	1.58%	1.79%	0.89%	1.48%	1.38%	1.68%	0.71%
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUAA.L and PQVM.L in my portfolio?

VUAA.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VUAA.L or PQVM.L?

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUAA.L or PQVM.L?

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.

What is the main difference between VUAA.L and PQVM.L?

VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.