PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUAA.L is traded in USD, while IBTS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly higher than IBTS.L's 0.32% return.


VUAA.L

1D
2.02%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
8.41%
6M
9.69%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*

IBTS.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.62%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
8.41%17.37%25.27%26.68%-18.63%29.34%20.33%14.82%
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
0.32%5.49%4.02%3.79%-3.89%-0.28%2.72%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAA.L and IBTS.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAA.L
VUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTS.L
IBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUAA.LIBTS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.12

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.80

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

8.03

+4.42

VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAA.L and IBTS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, which is greater than IBTS.L's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and IBTS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAA.LIBTS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.05%

-16.87%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-1.07%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-1.45%

-16.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

-6.87%

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-0.65%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-10.07%

+5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.37%

+1.60%

Volatility

VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) at 1.60%. This indicates that VUAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAA.LIBTS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

1.60%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

3.46%

+5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

4.24%

+7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

5.06%

+10.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

5.08%

+12.73%

VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VUAA.L and IBTS.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAA.L vs. IBTS.L - Dividend Comparison

VUAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
3.99%4.22%4.12%3.08%0.75%0.61%1.84%2.39%1.49%1.01%0.67%0.49%
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUAA.L and IBTS.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.L and IBTS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IBTS.L is Government Bonds. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and IBTS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer