PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUAA.L is traded in USD, while HDLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HDLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than HDLG.L's 9.32% return.


VUAA.L

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
7.55%
6M
7.31%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*

HDLG.L

1D
1.17%
1M
2.66%
YTD
9.32%
6M
10.29%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
7.55%17.37%25.27%26.68%-18.63%29.34%20.33%14.82%
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
9.32%3.71%16.48%0.51%0.42%25.32%-11.25%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAA.L and HDLG.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between VUAA.L and HDLG.L has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUAA.L
HDLG.L

Technology

39.1%
1.5%

Financial Services

10.9%
16.8%

Communication Services

10.7%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
3.7%

Healthcare

8.3%
4.9%

Industrials

7.8%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
18.3%

Energy

3.1%
11.7%

Utilities

2.1%
14.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
21.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
0.0%

Technology

VUAA.L
39.1%
HDLG.L
1.5%

Financial Services

VUAA.L
10.9%
HDLG.L
16.8%

Communication Services

VUAA.L
10.7%
HDLG.L
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VUAA.L
9.9%
HDLG.L
3.7%

Healthcare

VUAA.L
8.3%
HDLG.L
4.9%

Industrials

VUAA.L
7.8%
HDLG.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VUAA.L
4.5%
HDLG.L
18.3%

Energy

VUAA.L
3.1%
HDLG.L
11.7%

Utilities

VUAA.L
2.1%
HDLG.L
14.0%

Real Estate

VUAA.L
1.8%
HDLG.L
21.2%

Basic Materials

VUAA.L
1.7%
HDLG.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAA.L
VUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

HDLG.L
HDLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUAA.LHDLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.00

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

4.41

+6.30

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAA.L and HDLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, smaller than the maximum HDLG.L drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and HDLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAA.LHDLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.05%

-40.58%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-6.96%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-14.74%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

-20.22%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-0.66%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-11.96%

+6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.16%

-1.15%

Volatility

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) at 3.56%. This indicates that VUAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAA.LHDLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.56%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

8.27%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

10.89%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

14.04%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

16.23%

+1.55%

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUAA.L vs. HDLG.L - Dividend Comparison

VUAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
3.49%3.94%3.46%4.11%3.49%3.30%4.65%3.77%3.67%3.17%2.88%1.86%
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUAA.L and HDLG.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLG.L.

VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while HDLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.30% for HDLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and HDLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer