PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. VSEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. VSEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund (VSEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than VSEQX's 13.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTV having a 12.42% annualized return and VSEQX not far ahead at 12.78%.


VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%

VSEQX

1D
-1.99%
1M
0.42%
YTD
13.94%
6M
14.10%
1Y
31.44%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. VSEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
VSEQX
Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund
13.94%15.32%16.67%19.31%-11.90%30.83%10.26%26.76%-11.86%12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and VSEQX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.88

The correlation between VTV and VSEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTV vs. VSEQX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
VSEQX

Financial Services

22.3%
15.2%

Healthcare

14.5%
11.0%

Industrials

14.0%
16.6%

Technology

13.4%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
3.6%

Energy

8.1%
5.5%

Utilities

5.2%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
10.3%

Communication Services

3.3%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.9%

Real Estate

2.8%
6.7%

Financial Services

VTV
22.3%
VSEQX
15.2%

Healthcare

VTV
14.5%
VSEQX
11.0%

Industrials

VTV
14.0%
VSEQX
16.6%

Technology

VTV
13.4%
VSEQX
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

VTV
9.4%
VSEQX
3.6%

Energy

VTV
8.1%
VSEQX
5.5%

Utilities

VTV
5.2%
VSEQX
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
4.0%
VSEQX
10.3%

Communication Services

VTV
3.3%
VSEQX
3.8%

Basic Materials

VTV
3.1%
VSEQX
4.9%

Real Estate

VTV
2.8%
VSEQX
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. VSEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VSEQX
VSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. VSEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund (VSEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVVSEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

4.36

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.20

16.75

-1.54

VTV vs. VSEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the VSEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and VSEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVVSEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.18

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.58

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.60

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.50

+0.01

Drawdowns

VTV vs. VSEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum VSEQX drawdown of -63.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and VSEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVVSEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-63.55%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-7.60%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-24.73%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-24.73%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-44.08%

+7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.99%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-9.06%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.97%

-0.29%

Volatility

VTV vs. VSEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.65%, while Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund (VSEQX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVVSEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

4.18%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

10.84%

-3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

15.19%

-5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

19.96%

-6.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

21.42%

-4.74%

VTV vs. VSEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VSEQX's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTV vs. VSEQX - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than VSEQX's 9.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VSEQX
Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund
9.79%11.16%11.36%6.11%11.77%21.36%1.77%2.92%10.34%7.05%3.13%12.28%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and VSEQX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSEQX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs VSEQX's -63.55%.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and VSEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer