VTV vs. SPMD
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while SPMD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.78%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for SPMD. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPMD.
Performance
VTV vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly lower than SPMD's 15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed SPMD with an annualized return of 12.78%, while SPMD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.78% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
SPMD
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 5.31%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 27.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
VTV vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 14.29% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 15.51% | 7.44% | 13.91% | 16.48% | -13.13% | 24.76% | 13.46% | 25.19% | -10.34% | 15.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and SPMD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.82 |
The correlation between VTV and SPMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
SPMD
VTV vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTV | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.29 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 2.95 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.04 | 10.81 | +5.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTV vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMD drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and SPMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -57.62% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -8.86% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -24.08% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -24.08% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -41.86% | +5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -8.11% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.41% | -0.73% |
Volatility
VTV vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.34%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 5.07% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 11.77% | -3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.38% | 15.91% | -5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 19.75% | -5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 21.20% | -4.52% |
VTV vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than SPMD's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and SPMD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMD has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs SPMD's -57.62%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.78% vs 11.78% for SPMD. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SPMD.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.21% for SPMD.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPMD is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.05% for SPMD.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and SPMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer