VTV vs. LSVD
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. VTV is passively managed, while LSVD is actively managed. Over the past year, VTV returned 26.25% vs 43.26% for LSVD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LSVD.
Performance
VTV vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly lower than LSVD's 17.67% return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
LSVD
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 17.67%
- 6M
- 18.95%
- 1Y
- 43.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTV vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 12.30% | 15.27% | 0.81% |
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 17.67% | 22.29% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and LSVD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.75 |
The correlation between VTV and LSVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTV vs. LSVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
LSVD
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
LSVD
Healthcare
VTV
LSVD
Industrials
VTV
LSVD
Technology
VTV
LSVD
Consumer Defensive
VTV
LSVD
Energy
VTV
LSVD
Utilities
VTV
LSVD
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
LSVD
Communication Services
VTV
LSVD
Basic Materials
VTV
LSVD
Real Estate
VTV
LSVD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
LSVD
VTV vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.61 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.15 | 5.38 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.69 | 24.69 | -9.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 3.41 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.66 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
VTV vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than LSVD's maximum drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and LSVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -19.30% | -39.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -8.07% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.53% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -2.47% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.76% | -0.08% |
Volatility
VTV vs. LSVD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.52%, while LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 3.36% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.55% | 9.52% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.11% | 12.76% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 17.45% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 17.45% | -0.78% |
VTV vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTV vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than LSVD's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and LSVD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSVD has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs LSVD's -19.30%.
On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 43.26% vs 26.25% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 43.26% return vs 26.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.40% for LSVD.
LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and LSVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer