VTV vs. IXC
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.64%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for IXC. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
VTV vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 28.81% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 12.64%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
IXC
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 28.81%
- 6M
- 27.41%
- 1Y
- 39.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
VTV vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 13.24% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 28.81% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and IXC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VTV and IXC has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VTV vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
IXC
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VTV
IXC
-
Healthcare
VTV
IXC
-
Industrials
VTV
IXC
-
Technology
VTV
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
VTV
IXC
-
Energy
VTV
IXC
Utilities
VTV
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
IXC
-
Communication Services
VTV
IXC
-
Basic Materials
VTV
IXC
-
Real Estate
VTV
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
IXC
VTV vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTV | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.35 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 4.11 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.75 | 11.84 | +3.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTV vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -67.88% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -9.66% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -19.06% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -24.93% | +7.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -64.16% | +27.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.29% | +7.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -17.47% | +9.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 3.35% | -1.67% |
Volatility
VTV vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.25%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 6.43% | -3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 15.64% | -7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 18.83% | -8.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 23.54% | -9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 26.84% | -10.16% |
VTV vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTV vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than IXC's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.86% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.85% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and IXC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to VTV (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.64% vs 9.93% for IXC. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.85% for VTV.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.40% for IXC.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer