VTV vs. HYG
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.64%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for HYG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
VTV vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 12.64%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.00% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
HYG
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
VTV vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 13.24% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.65% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and HYG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | 0.61 |
The correlation between VTV and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTV vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
HYG
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
HYG
-
Healthcare
VTV
HYG
-
Industrials
VTV
HYG
-
Technology
VTV
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
VTV
HYG
-
Energy
VTV
HYG
-
Utilities
VTV
HYG
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
HYG
-
Communication Services
VTV
HYG
-
Basic Materials
VTV
HYG
-
Real Estate
VTV
HYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
HYG
VTV vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTV | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 2.84 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.75 | 12.46 | +3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTV vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -34.25% | -25.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -2.34% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -4.56% | -9.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -15.79% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -22.03% | -14.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -3.24% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 0.53% | +1.15% |
Volatility
VTV vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.31%. This indicates that VTV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 1.31% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 3.10% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 3.87% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 7.53% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 8.29% | +8.39% |
VTV vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTV vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than HYG's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.85% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and HYG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTV has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to HYG (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.64% vs 5.00% for HYG. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 1.85% for VTV.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.49% for HYG.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer