VTV vs. FSKAX

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) are both funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while FSKAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.81%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for FSKAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FSKAX.

Performance

VTV vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 12.81%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.

VTV

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 5.60%
• YTD: 14.90%
• 6M: 14.16%
• 1Y: 28.57%
• 3Y*: 18.04%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: 12.81%

FSKAX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 10.07%
• 1Y: 26.33%
• 3Y*: 20.67%
• 5Y*: 12.24%
• 10Y*: 14.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	14.90%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	26.53%	2.33%	25.66%	-5.47%	17.15%
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	9.75%	17.06%	23.89%	26.12%	-19.53%	25.66%	20.79%	30.92%	-5.32%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and FSKAX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011	0.88

The correlation between VTV and FSKAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VTV vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 89
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FSKAX

FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VTV	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	1.95	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	2.65	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.35	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.52	2.80	+1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.04	12.51	+4.53

VTV vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VTV vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and FSKAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTV	FSKAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.27%	-35.01%	-24.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.35%	-8.92%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.52%	-19.43%	+4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.04%	-25.39%	+8.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.78%	-35.01%	-1.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.08%	+2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.86%	-4.01%	-3.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	1.99%	-0.31%

Volatility

VTV vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.35%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTV	FSKAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	4.64%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.80%	9.97%	-2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.36%	12.79%	-2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.93%	17.48%	-3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.69%	18.49%	-1.80%

VTV vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTV vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than FSKAX's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	0.95%	1.01%	1.19%	1.41%	1.62%	1.15%	1.45%	1.94%	2.54%	2.07%	2.43%	0.82%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.82%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTV and FSKAX in my portfolio?

VTV and FSKAX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTV or FSKAX?

FSKAX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to VTV (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.