PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. DIVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.10% return.


VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%

DIVZ

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
3.10%
6M
3.41%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%25.42%
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
3.10%16.72%18.44%-0.51%3.51%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and DIVZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.89

The correlation between VTV and DIVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTV vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
DIVZ

Financial Services

22.3%
8.7%

Healthcare

14.5%
16.0%

Industrials

14.0%
4.6%

Technology

13.4%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
20.0%

Energy

8.1%
19.4%

Utilities

5.2%
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
6.6%

Communication Services

3.3%
5.9%

Basic Materials

3.1%
5.7%

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Financial Services

VTV
22.3%
DIVZ
8.7%

Healthcare

VTV
14.5%
DIVZ
16.0%

Industrials

VTV
14.0%
DIVZ
4.6%

Technology

VTV
13.4%
DIVZ
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

VTV
9.4%
DIVZ
20.0%

Energy

VTV
8.1%
DIVZ
19.4%

Utilities

VTV
5.2%
DIVZ
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
4.0%
DIVZ
6.6%

Communication Services

VTV
3.3%
DIVZ
5.9%

Basic Materials

VTV
3.1%
DIVZ
5.7%

Real Estate

VTV
2.8%
DIVZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVZ
DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVDIVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.19

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

1.79

+2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.69

4.44

+11.25

VTV vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVDIVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.13

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.66

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.89

-0.38

Drawdowns

VTV vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and DIVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVDIVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-15.42%

-43.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-5.83%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-9.52%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-15.42%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.50%

+4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-3.49%

-4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.35%

-0.67%

Volatility

VTV vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.52%, while Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVDIVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

3.33%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

7.02%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.11%

9.28%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

12.65%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

12.57%

+4.10%

VTV vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTV vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than DIVZ's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
2.60%2.60%2.63%3.66%3.23%3.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVZ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 11.24% vs 8.36% for DIVZ. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.65% for DIVZ.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and DIVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer