VTV vs. BGIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. VTV is passively managed, while BGIG is actively managed. Over the past year, VTV returned 26.25% vs 19.51% for BGIG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.

Performance

VTV vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly higher than BGIG's 9.84% return.

VTV

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 4.23%
• YTD: 12.30%
• 6M: 13.12%
• 1Y: 26.25%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 11.24%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

BGIG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 6M: 9.56%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	12.30%	15.27%	15.95%	5.56%
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	9.84%	12.49%	16.84%	4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and BGIG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	0.89

The correlation between VTV and BGIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTV vs. BGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VTV	BGIG
Financial Services	22.3%	14.8%
Healthcare	14.5%	14.6%
Industrials	14.0%	10.6%
Technology	13.4%	24.6%
Consumer Defensive	9.4%	6.9%
Energy	8.1%	11.2%
Utilities	5.2%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	5.4%
Communication Services	3.3%	-
Basic Materials	3.1%	0.6%
Real Estate	2.8%	3.5%

Return for Risk

VTV vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 79
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

BGIG

BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 68
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VTV	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.18	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	3.13	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.39	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.15	3.37	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.69	12.97	+2.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTV vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the BGIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and BGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTV	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	2.18	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.38	-0.87

Drawdowns

VTV vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than BGIG's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and BGIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTV	BGIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.27%	-13.24%	-46.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.35%	-5.81%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.28%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-1.70%	-6.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	1.51%	+0.17%

Volatility

VTV vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) have volatilities of 2.52% and 2.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTV	BGIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	2.57%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.55%	6.72%	+0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.11%	9.00%	+1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.88%	11.94%	+1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.67%	11.94%	+4.73%

VTV vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

VTV vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than BGIG's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	1.75%	1.89%	2.02%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.86%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTV and BGIG in my portfolio?

VTV and BGIG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTV or BGIG?

BGIG has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs BGIG's -13.24%.

Which ETF is better, VTV or BGIG?

On 1-year performance, VTV leads with 26.25% vs 19.51% for BGIG. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VTV or BGIG?

Over the 1-year period, VTV has performed better with a 26.25% return vs 19.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTV or BGIG?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BGIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTV or BGIG?

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.75% for BGIG.

What is the main difference between VTV and BGIG?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.45% for BGIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.