PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTSNX vs. FLCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTSNX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTSNX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTSNX achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly higher than FLCPX's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VTSNX has underperformed FLCPX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while FLCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.


VTSNX

1D
-0.81%
1M
3.56%
YTD
14.48%
6M
16.99%
1Y
31.53%
3Y*
19.50%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
9.80%

FLCPX

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.82%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTSNX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTSNX
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares
14.48%32.24%5.38%15.29%-15.99%8.64%11.27%21.69%-14.41%27.54%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
10.91%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%31.59%-4.38%21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VTSNX and FLCPX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2016

0.78

The correlation between VTSNX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTSNX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTSNX
VTSNX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VTSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VTSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTSNX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTSNX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTSNXFLCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.18

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.36

14.85

-3.49

VTSNX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTSNX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTSNXFLCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.38

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.82

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.86

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.92

-0.50

Drawdowns

VTSNX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTSNX drawdown since its inception was -35.72%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTSNX and FLCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTSNXFLCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.72%

-33.87%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-8.89%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-18.76%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.55%

-24.40%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.72%

-33.87%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.72%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-4.19%

-3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

1.90%

+0.95%

Volatility

VTSNX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTSNX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) at 2.91%. This indicates that VTSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTSNXFLCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

2.91%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.92%

9.00%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

11.88%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

17.07%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

18.16%

-2.23%

VTSNX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTSNX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTSNX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

VTSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than FLCPX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.51%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%0.00%
VTSNX
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares
2.64%3.17%3.36%3.24%3.08%3.08%2.13%3.16%3.19%2.75%2.95%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTSNX and FLCPX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTSNX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to FLCPX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTSNX dropped -35.72% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTSNX and FLCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer