VTS.AX vs. GLIN.AX
VTS.AX (Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF) and GLIN.AX (iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VTS.AX tracks the Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index Index while GLIN.AX tracks the iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VTS.AX returned 18.88%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for GLIN.AX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VTS.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTS.AX achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN.AX's 12.44% return.
VTS.AX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 6.25%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
GLIN.AX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTS.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VTS.AX Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF | 6.25% | 8.85% | 35.88% | 13.67% |
GLIN.AX iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 12.44% | 12.04% | 12.01% | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTS.AX and GLIN.AX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTS.AX vs. GLIN.AX — Risk / Return Rank
VTS.AX
GLIN.AX
VTS.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF (VTS.AX) and iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTS.AX | GLIN.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 3.19 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 9.92 | -6.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTS.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTS.AX drawdown since its inception was -26.03%, which is greater than GLIN.AX's maximum drawdown of -12.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTS.AX and GLIN.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTS.AX | GLIN.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.03% | -12.66% | -13.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -5.76% | -5.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.17% | -12.66% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -1.16% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -2.24% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 1.87% | +2.22% |
Volatility
VTS.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF (VTS.AX) is 2.47%, while iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that VTS.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIN.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTS.AX | GLIN.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 3.15% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.02% | 8.80% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 10.72% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 12.33% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 12.33% | +2.23% |
Dividends
VTS.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Dividend Comparison
VTS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than GLIN.AX's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIN.AX iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 5.93% | 2.94% | 2.60% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTS.AX Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF | 1.07% | 1.05% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 1.53% | 1.09% | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.66% | 1.10% | 1.57% | 1.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTS.AX and GLIN.AX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTS.AX tracks Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index Index, while GLIN.AX tracks iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.
Find the right allocation for VTS.AX and GLIN.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer