PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTIP vs. FSTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTIP vs. FSTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTIP having a 2.05% return and FSTZX slightly higher at 2.09%.


VTIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.14%

FSTZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.09%
6M
2.02%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTIP vs. FSTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
2.05%6.07%4.74%4.62%-2.94%1.44%
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
2.09%5.99%4.87%4.67%-2.83%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VTIP and FSTZX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.89

The correlation between VTIP and FSTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTIP vs. FSTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTIP
VTIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTZX
FSTZX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FSTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTIP vs. FSTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIPFSTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.65

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.75

6.68

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.06

24.52

+1.55

VTIP vs. FSTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is comparable to the FSTZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTIP and FSTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIPFSTZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

2.86

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.20

-0.30

Drawdowns

VTIP vs. FSTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTIP drawdown since its inception was -6.27%, which is greater than FSTZX's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTIP and FSTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIPFSTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-5.30%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.70%

-0.70%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

-1.03%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-1.09%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.19%

-0.01%

Volatility

VTIP vs. FSTZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) is 0.43%, while Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) has a volatility of 0.51%. This indicates that VTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIPFSTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

0.51%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.02%

1.09%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50%

1.64%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.77%

2.79%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.74%

2.79%

-0.05%

VTIP vs. FSTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTIP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTZX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTIP vs. FSTZX - Dividend Comparison

VTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than FSTZX's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.64%4.02%2.78%2.54%5.25%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
3.58%3.81%2.70%2.86%6.84%4.68%1.20%1.95%2.45%1.52%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTIP and FSTZX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTZX has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to VTIP (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTIP dropped -6.27% vs FSTZX's -5.30%.

VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTIP and FSTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer