VTIP vs. FGDL
VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index, while FGDL is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VTIP returned 5.25%/yr vs 29.18%/yr for FGDL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTIP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FGDL.
Performance
VTIP vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTIP achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than FGDL's -2.81% return.
VTIP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
FGDL
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- 1Y
- 22.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTIP vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.85% | 6.07% | 4.74% | 4.62% | -1.44% |
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | -2.81% | 64.15% | 27.31% | 12.92% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTIP and FGDL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.37 |
The correlation between VTIP and FGDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTIP vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank
VTIP
FGDL
VTIP vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTIP | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.18 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.57 | 0.97 | +5.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.36 | 2.78 | +22.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTIP vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTIP drawdown since its inception was -6.27%, smaller than the maximum FGDL drawdown of -24.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTIP and FGDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTIP | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -24.73% | +18.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.70% | -24.73% | +24.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.98% | -24.73% | +23.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -22.35% | +22.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -3.97% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 8.64% | -8.46% |
Volatility
VTIP vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) is 0.40%, while Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) has a volatility of 8.01%. This indicates that VTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTIP | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 8.01% | -7.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.04% | 24.16% | -23.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 27.60% | -26.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.77% | 19.27% | -16.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 19.27% | -16.53% |
VTIP vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTIP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTIP vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison
VTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 3.59% | 3.81% | 2.70% | 2.86% | 6.84% | 4.68% | 1.20% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 1.52% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTIP and FGDL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGDL has higher volatility (8.01%) compared to VTIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTIP dropped -6.27% vs FGDL's -24.73%.
On 3-year performance, FGDL leads with 29.18% vs 5.25% for VTIP. On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FGDL has performed better with a 29.18% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FGDL.
VTIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for FGDL.
VTIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while FGDL is Precious Metals. VTIP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index, while FGDL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTIP and 0.15% for FGDL.
VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTIP and FGDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer