VTG vs. GLDM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).

VTG and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VTG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2025. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018. Both VTG and GLDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VTG vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VTG vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF	-0.02%	2.88%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	10.46%	30.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTG achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 10.46% return.

VTG

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.32%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: 0.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -10.65%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 23.17%
• 1Y: 52.61%
• 3Y*: 34.09%
• 5Y*: 22.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTG vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GLDM

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

VTG

Vanguard Total Treasury ETF

Return for Risk

VTG vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 86
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 85
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTG vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTG	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	1.11	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between VTG and GLDM is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VTG vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF	2.61%	1.65%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

VTG vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTG drawdown since its inception was -2.35%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTG and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTG	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.35%	-21.63%	+19.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-11.68%	+9.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-6.05%	+5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VTG	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.57%	27.58%	-24.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.57%	17.65%	-14.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.57%	16.78%	-13.21%