PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTBNX vs. VUSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTBNX vs. VUSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VUSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTBNX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than VUSFX's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VTBNX has underperformed VUSFX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while VUSFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.71% annualized return.


VTBNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.25%
1Y
5.21%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.55%

VUSFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
2.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTBNX vs. VUSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
0.33%7.18%1.32%5.68%-13.12%-1.82%7.39%8.71%-0.27%3.62%
VUSFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares
1.42%5.11%6.11%5.53%-0.38%0.08%2.10%3.39%2.10%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VTBNX and VUSFX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2016

0.48

The correlation between VTBNX and VUSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTBNX vs. VUSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTBNX
VTBNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VTBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VTBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VUSFX
VUSFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VUSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTBNX vs. VUSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VUSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTBNXVUSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-13.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

4.69

-3.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

18.20

-16.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

108.57

-103.04

VTBNX vs. VUSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTBNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the VUSFX Sharpe Ratio of 7.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTBNX and VUSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTBNXVUSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

7.69

-6.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

4.35

-4.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

4.00

-3.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

4.00

-3.62

Drawdowns

VTBNX vs. VUSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTBNX drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, which is greater than VUSFX's maximum drawdown of -1.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTBNX and VUSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTBNXVUSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.71%

-1.71%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-0.25%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

-0.35%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.05%

-1.71%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

-1.71%

-17.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

0.00%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-0.15%

-4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.04%

+0.91%

Volatility

VTBNX vs. VUSFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VUSFX) at 0.13%. This indicates that VTBNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTBNXVUSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

0.13%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

0.41%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

0.59%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.96%

0.81%

+5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

0.68%

+4.25%

VTBNX vs. VUSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTBNX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VUSFX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTBNX vs. VUSFX - Dividend Comparison

VTBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than VUSFX's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
4.06%3.95%3.77%3.13%2.54%1.82%3.12%2.79%2.56%2.52%2.55%
VUSFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares
4.53%4.73%5.52%4.15%1.38%0.53%1.62%2.68%2.23%1.52%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTBNX and VUSFX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTBNX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to VUSFX (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTBNX dropped -18.71% vs VUSFX's -1.71%.

VUSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.69 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTBNX and VUSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer