PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTBNX vs. VITSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTBNX vs. VITSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTBNX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than VITSX's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, VTBNX has underperformed VITSX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while VITSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.


VTBNX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.25%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.53%

VITSX

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.07%
YTD
11.14%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTBNX vs. VITSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
0.12%7.18%1.32%5.68%-13.12%-1.82%7.39%8.71%-0.27%3.62%
VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
11.14%17.14%23.25%26.51%-19.51%25.74%20.99%30.80%-5.18%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VTBNX and VITSX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2016

-0.03

The correlation between VTBNX and VITSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTBNX vs. VITSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTBNX
VTBNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VTBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VTBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VITSX
VITSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VITSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VITSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTBNX vs. VITSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTBNXVITSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

3.17

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

14.62

-9.35

VTBNX vs. VITSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTBNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the VITSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTBNX and VITSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTBNXVITSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.32

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.73

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.82

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.49

-0.12

Drawdowns

VTBNX vs. VITSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTBNX drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, smaller than the maximum VITSX drawdown of -55.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTBNX and VITSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTBNXVITSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.71%

-55.30%

+36.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-8.92%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

-19.36%

+13.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.05%

-25.36%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

-34.97%

+16.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-0.76%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-10.07%

+5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.93%

-0.98%

Volatility

VTBNX vs. VITSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) is 1.31%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that VTBNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTBNXVITSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

3.05%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

9.20%

-6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

12.22%

-8.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.96%

17.36%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

18.41%

-13.48%

VTBNX vs. VITSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTBNX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VITSX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTBNX vs. VITSX - Dividend Comparison

VTBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than VITSX's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.43%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.77%2.04%1.71%1.93%1.99%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
4.06%3.95%3.77%3.13%2.54%1.82%3.12%2.79%2.56%2.52%2.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTBNX and VITSX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VITSX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to VTBNX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTBNX dropped -18.71% vs VITSX's -55.30%.

VITSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTBNX and VITSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer