PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSTBX vs. VICBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSTBX vs. VICBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSTBX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSTBX achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than VICBX's -0.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSTBX having a 2.93% annualized return and VICBX not far behind at 2.89%.


VSTBX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.08%
6M
0.53%
YTD
0.91%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
2.93%
ALL TIME*
3.12%

VICBX

1D
0.15%
1M
-1.02%
6M
-0.67%
YTD
-0.45%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
2.89%
ALL TIME*
4.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VSTBX vs. VICBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSTBX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.91%6.75%5.37%6.17%-5.73%-0.41%5.07%9.68%0.92%2.48%
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
-0.45%9.37%3.67%8.87%-14.06%-1.50%9.57%15.96%-1.72%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VSTBX and VICBX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

0.90

The correlation between VSTBX and VICBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSTBX vs. VICBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VSTBX
VSTBX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VSTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VICBX
VICBX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VICBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VICBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VSTBX vs. VICBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSTBX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSTBXVICBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.15

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

1.11

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

3.13

+7.75

VSTBX vs. VICBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSTBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the VICBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSTBX and VICBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSTBX vs. VICBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSTBX drawdown since its inception was -9.34%, smaller than the maximum VICBX drawdown of -20.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTBX and VICBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSTBXVICBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-20.55%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-2.95%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.31%

-5.21%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.34%

-20.52%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.34%

-20.55%

+11.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.97%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-3.12%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

1.04%

-0.70%

Volatility

VSTBX vs. VICBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSTBX) is 0.48%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that VSTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VICBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSTBXVICBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

1.03%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

3.09%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78%

3.89%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.73%

6.17%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.38%

5.34%

-2.96%

VSTBX vs. VICBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VSTBX and VICBX have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSTBX vs. VICBX - Dividend Comparison

VSTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than VICBX's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.44%4.61%4.79%3.72%3.02%2.82%2.79%5.01%3.64%3.23%3.32%3.39%
VSTBX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.07%4.34%4.29%3.09%2.00%1.80%2.27%5.40%2.67%2.27%1.96%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VSTBX and VICBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VICBX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to VSTBX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSTBX dropped -9.34% vs VICBX's -20.55%.

VSTBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSTBX and VICBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer