PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VSP.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF) and XUH.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - VSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XUH.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VSP.TO returned 13.86%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for XUH.TO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSP.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XUH.TO.

Performance

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF (VSP.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VSP.TO having a 10.06% return and XUH.TO slightly lower at 9.59%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSP.TO having a 13.86% annualized return and XUH.TO not far behind at 13.19%.

VSP.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
4.56%
YTD
10.06%
6M
9.82%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
20.52%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*
13.86%

XUH.TO

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.13%
YTD
9.59%
6M
9.67%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSP.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF		10.06%15.49%23.68%24.16%-19.24%27.90%15.32%30.18%-6.75%21.05%
XUH.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		9.59%15.11%22.45%24.06%-20.19%26.19%15.53%28.46%-7.51%20.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VSP.TO and XUH.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.82

The correlation between VSP.TO and XUH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VSP.TO
XUH.TO

Technology

35.7%
38.5%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.0%

Communication Services

11.3%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.2%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.4%

Energy

3.5%
3.3%

Utilities

2.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

VSP.TO
35.7%
XUH.TO
38.5%

Financial Services

VSP.TO
11.6%
XUH.TO
11.0%

Communication Services

VSP.TO
11.3%
XUH.TO
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VSP.TO
10.2%
XUH.TO
9.6%

Healthcare

VSP.TO
8.5%
XUH.TO
8.2%

Industrials

VSP.TO
8.3%
XUH.TO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VSP.TO
4.9%
XUH.TO
4.4%

Energy

VSP.TO
3.5%
XUH.TO
3.3%

Utilities

VSP.TO
2.4%
XUH.TO
2.5%

Real Estate

VSP.TO
1.9%
XUH.TO
2.0%

Basic Materials

VSP.TO
1.8%
XUH.TO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF

iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with VSP.TO:
VSP.TO vs. VFV.TOVSP.TO vs. XSP.TOVSP.TO vs. ZSP.TOVSP.TO vs. VOOVSP.TO vs. SPYVSP.TO vs. VTIVSP.TO vs. QQQ
Often compared with XUH.TO:
XUH.TO vs. XUU.TOXUH.TO vs. XUU-U.TOXUH.TO vs. VFV.TOXUH.TO vs. XSU.TOXUH.TO vs. IUSGXUH.TO vs. VYMXUH.TO vs. ZWH.TO

Return for Risk

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VSP.TO
VSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
XUH.TO
XUH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XUH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF (VSP.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VSP.TOXUH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.08
2.02

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.88
2.82

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.66

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.47

12.06

+0.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the XUH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSP.TO and XUH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VSP.TOXUH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.02

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.66

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.71

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.64

+0.20

Drawdowns

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSP.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, smaller than the maximum XUH.TO drawdown of -38.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSP.TO and XUH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VSP.TOXUH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-38.37%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-9.41%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-19.32%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.54%

-26.11%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.55%

-38.37%

+2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-0.66%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-4.96%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.07%

-0.01%

Volatility

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF (VSP.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO) at 3.21%. This indicates that VSP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VSP.TOXUH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

3.21%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

9.36%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

12.41%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

17.08%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

18.70%

-0.68%

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSP.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XUH.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VSP.TO vs. XUH.TO - Dividend Comparison

VSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than XUH.TO's 0.82% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VSP.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 CAD-hedged ETF		0.84%0.92%1.07%1.17%1.37%1.07%1.27%1.52%1.76%1.46%1.69%1.75%
XUH.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.82%0.91%1.10%1.15%1.40%0.98%1.25%1.67%1.81%1.25%1.63%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.93, VSP.TO and XUH.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUH.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUH.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VSP.TO.

VSP.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XUH.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. VSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XUH.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VSP.TO and 0.08% for XUH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSP.TO and XUH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer