VSNGX vs. EISMX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

VSNGX (JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund) and EISMX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VSNGX returned 12.03%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for EISMX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSNGX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EISMX.

Performance

VSNGX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSNGX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than EISMX's -2.06% return. Over the past 10 years, VSNGX has outperformed EISMX with an annualized return of 12.03%, while EISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.

VSNGX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 7.99%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 12.30%
• 3Y*: 14.64%
• 5Y*: 6.81%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

EISMX

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: -2.06%
• 6M: -3.58%
• 1Y: -4.95%
• 3Y*: 7.10%
• 5Y*: 3.68%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSNGX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VSNGX JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund	7.99%	6.09%	18.60%	16.15%	-16.03%	19.97%	22.62%	32.73%	-8.20%	21.35%
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund	-2.06%	-5.66%	17.64%	14.01%	-8.77%	22.02%	11.31%	34.37%	-5.55%	24.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VSNGX and EISMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2002	0.93

The correlation between VSNGX and EISMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VSNGX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSNGX

VSNGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
VSNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
VSNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
VSNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
VSNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
VSNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

EISMX

EISMX Risk / Return Rank: 2
EISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSNGX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VSNGX	EISMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	-0.35	+1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	-0.41	+2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.96	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	-0.37	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.12	-0.69	+6.81

VSNGX vs. EISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSNGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the EISMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSNGX and EISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VSNGX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSNGX drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than EISMX's maximum drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSNGX and EISMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSNGX	EISMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.50%	-45.32%	-9.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.24%	-14.66%	+6.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.96%	-19.39%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.08%	-19.81%	-5.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.33%	-39.95%	+1.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-12.94%	+12.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.42%	-5.84%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	7.87%	-5.66%

Volatility

VSNGX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX) is 3.93%, while Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that VSNGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSNGX	EISMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	4.49%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.58%	11.61%	-2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.72%	15.58%	-2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.44%	17.15%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	18.84%	+0.73%

VSNGX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSNGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

VSNGX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison

VSNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than EISMX's 6.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund	6.56%	6.43%	7.26%	2.78%	10.37%	10.49%	9.80%	6.52%	7.20%	3.30%	3.58%	6.70%
VSNGX JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund	5.70%	6.15%	8.60%	0.50%	2.81%	7.63%	11.65%	8.60%	12.95%	5.79%	3.37%	5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSNGX and EISMX in my portfolio?

VSNGX and EISMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VSNGX or EISMX?

EISMX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to VSNGX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSNGX dropped -54.50% vs EISMX's -45.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VSNGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.