VSGAX vs. VMNFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VSGAX (Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares) and VMNFX (Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares) are both mutual funds - VSGAX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Vanguard, while VMNFX is a Long-Short fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, VSGAX returned 11.73%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for VMNFX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. VSGAX charges 0.07%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for VMNFX.

Performance

VSGAX vs. VMNFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSGAX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSGAX achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly higher than VMNFX's 12.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VSGAX has outperformed VMNFX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while VMNFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.00% annualized return.

VSGAX

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 17.46%
• 6M: 15.68%
• 1Y: 32.13%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 5.69%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

VMNFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 12.03%
• 6M: 14.75%
• 1Y: 18.35%
• 3Y*: 13.20%
• 5Y*: 12.98%
• 10Y*: 5.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSGAX vs. VMNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VSGAX Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares	17.46%	8.44%	14.94%	23.04%	-28.39%	5.70%	35.26%	32.76%	-5.69%	21.92%
VMNFX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares	12.03%	9.27%	5.78%	12.23%	13.48%	23.24%	-11.58%	-9.57%	0.60%	-4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VSGAX and VMNFX is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011	-0.02

The correlation between VSGAX and VMNFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.02 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSGAX vs. VMNFX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VSGAX	VMNFX
Technology	25.9%	13.0%
Industrials	24.7%	12.9%
Healthcare	15.3%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	12.7%
Financial Services	5.6%	19.9%
Energy	4.8%	4.7%
Real Estate	3.9%	7.6%
Communication Services	3.5%	3.6%
Basic Materials	3.2%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	3.0%
Utilities	1.2%	3.4%

Return for Risk

VSGAX vs. VMNFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSGAX

VSGAX Risk / Return Rank: 41
VSGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
VSGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
VSGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
VSGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VSGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

VMNFX

VMNFX Risk / Return Rank: 65
VMNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
VMNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VMNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
VMNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VMNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSGAX vs. VMNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSGAX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VSGAX	VMNFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	2.33	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	3.51	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.43	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	3.89	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	10.80	+0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VSGAX vs. VMNFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the VMNFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSGAX and VMNFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VSGAX	VMNFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	2.33	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	1.81	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.79	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.34	+0.24

Drawdowns

VSGAX vs. VMNFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSGAX drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, which is greater than VMNFX's maximum drawdown of -26.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSGAX and VMNFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSGAX	VMNFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.70%	-26.42%	-12.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-4.65%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	-5.44%	-22.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.36%	-6.75%	-31.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.70%	-25.09%	-13.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	0.00%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.55%	-8.76%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	1.68%	+1.30%

Volatility

VSGAX vs. VMNFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSGAX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) at 1.97%. This indicates that VSGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSGAX	VMNFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	1.97%	+3.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.84%	5.75%	+9.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.48%	7.79%	+11.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.56%	7.21%	+16.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.00%	6.39%	+16.61%

VSGAX vs. VMNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSGAX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VMNFX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

VSGAX vs. VMNFX - Dividend Comparison

VSGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than VMNFX's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VMNFX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares	3.13%	3.53%	5.61%	5.09%	0.75%	0.16%	0.81%	3.16%	0.94%	1.07%	0.38%	0.02%
VSGAX Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares	0.44%	0.54%	0.54%	0.67%	0.55%	0.36%	0.44%	0.57%	0.79%	0.81%	1.08%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSGAX and VMNFX in my portfolio?

VSGAX and VMNFX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VSGAX or VMNFX?

VSGAX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to VMNFX (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSGAX dropped -38.70% vs VMNFX's -26.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.