VSDB vs. SJLD
VSDB (Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares) and SJLD (SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VSDB returned 4.75% vs 4.88% for SJLD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VSDB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SJLD.
Performance
VSDB vs. SJLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSDB achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than SJLD's 1.71% return.
VSDB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SJLD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSDB vs. SJLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VSDB Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares | 0.95% | 4.88% |
SJLD SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF | 1.71% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSDB and SJLD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSDB vs. SJLD — Risk / Return Rank
VSDB
SJLD
VSDB vs. SJLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB) and SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSDB | SJLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.61 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 4.69 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.67 | 21.43 | -6.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSDB vs. SJLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSDB drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, which is greater than SJLD's maximum drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDB and SJLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSDB | SJLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -1.04% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.42% | -1.04% | -0.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.16% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -0.12% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 0.23% | +0.09% |
Volatility
VSDB vs. SJLD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) at 0.29%. This indicates that VSDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSDB | SJLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 0.29% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.39% | 1.17% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75% | 1.98% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.90% | 1.93% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.90% | 1.93% | -0.03% |
VSDB vs. SJLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSDB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SJLD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSDB vs. SJLD - Dividend Comparison
VSDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than SJLD's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SJLD SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF | 4.43% | 3.74% | 1.26% |
VSDB Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares | 4.16% | 3.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSDB and SJLD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSDB has higher volatility (0.52%) compared to SJLD (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDB dropped -1.42% vs SJLD's -1.04%.
On 1-year performance, SJLD leads with 4.88% vs 4.75% for VSDB. On fees, VSDB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SJLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SJLD has performed better with a 4.88% return vs 4.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSDB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SJLD.
SJLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 4.16% for VSDB.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SanJac Alpha. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VSDB and 0.35% for SJLD.
VSDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSDB and SJLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer