PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSCOX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSCOX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund (VSCOX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSCOX achieves a 20.19% return, which is significantly lower than VRTGX's 22.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VSCOX has outperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 14.02%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.


VSCOX

1D
1.20%
1M
4.94%
YTD
20.19%
6M
17.44%
1Y
30.37%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
14.02%

VRTGX

1D
1.15%
1M
5.93%
YTD
22.19%
6M
18.81%
1Y
42.31%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSCOX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSCOX
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund
20.19%2.93%10.28%15.15%-19.02%14.03%24.71%30.18%-3.27%41.64%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
22.19%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VSCOX and VRTGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.96

The correlation between VSCOX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSCOX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSCOX
VSCOX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VSCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSCOX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund (VSCOX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSCOXVRTGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.96

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

10.59

+0.39

VSCOX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSCOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSCOX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSCOX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSCOX drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCOX and VRTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCOXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.58%

-41.97%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-14.80%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.08%

-28.54%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-40.48%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.28%

-41.97%

+3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-10.41%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

4.13%

-1.22%

Volatility

VSCOX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund (VSCOX) is 5.41%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that VSCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCOXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

7.67%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

16.77%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

22.26%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

24.71%

-3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

24.59%

-2.28%

VSCOX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSCOX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSCOX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

VSCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than VRTGX's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.60%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%
VSCOX
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund
4.71%5.67%0.93%0.27%2.31%7.53%1.91%3.20%38.00%11.76%17.41%16.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VSCOX and VRTGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRTGX has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to VSCOX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSCOX dropped -59.58% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSCOX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer