PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VSCA.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LQDE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VSCA.L is traded in GBP, while LQDE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LQDE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSCA.L achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than LQDE.L's 0.05% return.


VSCA.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.34%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.30%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*

LQDE.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.30%
YTD
0.05%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
2.24%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
3.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VSCA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.73%-1.28%7.12%-0.30%7.72%0.72%0.35%3.18%
LQDE.L
iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.05%0.39%2.83%3.68%-8.03%-1.11%7.72%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VSCA.L and LQDE.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.51

The correlation between VSCA.L and LQDE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSCA.L
VSCA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VSCA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDE.L
LQDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LQDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VSCA.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LQDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSCA.LLQDE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.22

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

3.01

+0.10

VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSCA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the LQDE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSCA.L and LQDE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSCA.LLQDE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.90

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.10

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.48

-0.21

Drawdowns

VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSCA.L drawdown since its inception was -15.11%, smaller than the maximum LQDE.L drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCA.L and LQDE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCA.LLQDE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.11%

-27.34%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.25%

-5.44%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.78%

-9.22%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.11%

-15.49%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-8.44%

+4.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-6.86%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.21%

-0.59%

Volatility

VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VSCA.L) is 1.79%, while iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LQDE.L) has a volatility of 2.19%. This indicates that VSCA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCA.LLQDE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

2.19%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

5.97%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

7.41%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.88%

9.96%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.99%

11.50%

-2.51%

VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSCA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDE.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSCA.L vs. LQDE.L - Dividend Comparison

VSCA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQDE.L
iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing
4.97%4.89%5.02%4.58%3.74%2.68%2.77%3.42%3.69%3.25%3.40%3.36%
VSCA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSCA.L and LQDE.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VSCA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VSCA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LQDE.L.

VSCA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while LQDE.L tracks Morningstar US Corporate Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VSCA.L and 0.20% for LQDE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSCA.L and LQDE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer