PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VSCA.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VSCA.L is traded in GBP, while FLO5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FLO5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSCA.L achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than FLO5.L's -0.08% return.


VSCA.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.34%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.30%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*

FLO5.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-0.62%
1Y
0.90%
3Y*
-2.22%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VSCA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.73%-1.28%7.12%-0.30%7.72%0.72%0.35%3.18%
FLO5.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
-0.08%-6.83%1.88%-4.56%11.92%1.15%-4.18%-1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VSCA.L and FLO5.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.94

The correlation between VSCA.L and FLO5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSCA.L
VSCA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VSCA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

FLO5.L
FLO5.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FLO5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VSCA.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSCA.LFLO5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.03

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.14

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

0.27

+2.83

VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSCA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the FLO5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSCA.L and FLO5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSCA.LFLO5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.12

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.13

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.02

+0.26

Drawdowns

VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSCA.L drawdown since its inception was -15.11%, smaller than the maximum FLO5.L drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCA.L and FLO5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCA.LFLO5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.11%

-20.77%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.25%

-6.65%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.78%

-13.32%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.11%

-20.77%

+5.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-19.16%

+15.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-9.76%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

3.28%

-1.66%

Volatility

VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VSCA.L) is 1.79%, while iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that VSCA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLO5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCA.LFLO5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

2.85%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

5.00%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

7.26%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.88%

9.03%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.99%

9.16%

-0.17%

VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSCA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLO5.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSCA.L vs. FLO5.L - Dividend Comparison

VSCA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLO5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLO5.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
0.05%0.05%0.06%0.06%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.00%
VSCA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VSCA.L and FLO5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VSCA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VSCA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for FLO5.L.

VSCA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while FLO5.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VSCA.L and 0.10% for FLO5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSCA.L and FLO5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer