PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Canadian Short Term Bond (VSB.TO) and BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSB.TO achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than ZFL.TO's 2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, VSB.TO has outperformed ZFL.TO with an annualized return of 1.94%, while ZFL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -1.37% annualized return.


VSB.TO

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.92%
YTD
0.97%
6M
0.78%
1Y
2.90%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
1.94%

ZFL.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
2.93%
YTD
2.39%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
-0.83%
3Y*
-0.42%
5Y*
-3.89%
10Y*
-1.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Short Term Bond
0.97%3.66%5.54%4.92%-3.93%-1.15%5.29%3.06%1.67%-0.36%
ZFL.TO
BMO Long Federal Bond
2.39%-5.14%-2.20%7.30%-23.89%-7.47%12.68%8.73%2.69%2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VSB.TO and ZFL.TO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2011

0.61

The correlation between VSB.TO and ZFL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.81 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSB.TO
VSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ZFL.TO
ZFL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ZFL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZFL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZFL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ZFL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZFL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Short Term Bond (VSB.TO) and BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSB.TOZFL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.99

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

-0.12

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

-0.22

+6.99

VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the ZFL.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSB.TO and ZFL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSB.TOZFL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

-0.09

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

-0.27

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

-0.11

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.16

+0.48

Drawdowns

VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, smaller than the maximum ZFL.TO drawdown of -40.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSB.TO and ZFL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSB.TOZFL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-40.32%

+31.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-6.68%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.43%

-14.51%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.88%

-32.25%

+25.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.38%

-40.32%

+31.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-31.87%

+31.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-12.45%

+11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

3.82%

-3.39%

Volatility

VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Canadian Short Term Bond (VSB.TO) is 0.71%, while BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that VSB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZFL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSB.TOZFL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

3.14%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

7.05%

-5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90%

9.72%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.57%

14.71%

-12.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.48%

12.54%

-9.06%

VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSB.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZFL.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSB.TO vs. ZFL.TO - Dividend Comparison

VSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than ZFL.TO's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VSB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Short Term Bond
3.00%3.04%3.04%2.66%2.24%2.02%2.24%2.31%2.29%2.34%2.45%2.38%
ZFL.TO
BMO Long Federal Bond
2.84%3.13%3.20%3.49%3.77%2.85%2.57%2.95%3.00%2.99%3.05%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSB.TO and ZFL.TO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VSB.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VSB.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZFL.TO.

VSB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Short Term Government Bond Index, while ZFL.TO tracks FTSE TMX Canada Long Term Federal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VSB.TO and 0.22% for ZFL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSB.TO and ZFL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer