PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTVX vs. VSMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTVX vs. VSMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTVX achieves a 21.21% return, which is significantly higher than VSMVX's 17.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VRTVX having a 10.93% annualized return and VSMVX not far behind at 10.71%.


VRTVX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.65%
YTD
21.21%
6M
19.11%
1Y
43.12%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.93%

VSMVX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.22%
YTD
17.74%
6M
16.42%
1Y
38.16%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTVX vs. VSMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
21.21%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.74%6.38%7.53%14.85%-11.12%30.85%2.79%24.47%-12.67%11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTVX and VSMVX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2012

0.98

The correlation between VRTVX and VSMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTVX vs. VSMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMVX
VSMVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VSMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTVX vs. VSMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTVXVSMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.30

4.28

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.02

14.20

+3.81

VRTVX vs. VSMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the VSMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTVX and VSMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRTVX vs. VSMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTVX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VSMVX drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTVX and VSMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTVXVSMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.98%

-47.61%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-9.33%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

-28.81%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-28.81%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.98%

-47.61%

+1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.37%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-7.62%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.81%

-0.30%

Volatility

VRTVX vs. VSMVX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX) at 4.80%. This indicates that VRTVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTVXVSMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

4.80%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

11.86%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

18.42%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

21.97%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.75%

24.15%

-0.40%

VRTVX vs. VSMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VRTVX and VSMVX have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRTVX vs. VSMVX - Dividend Comparison

VRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than VSMVX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.65%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.61%1.45%1.85%1.92%1.88%1.66%1.46%1.65%1.89%1.55%1.26%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VRTVX and VSMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRTVX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to VSMVX (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTVX dropped -45.98% vs VSMVX's -47.61%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTVX and VSMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer