PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTVX vs. PMJAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTVX vs. PMJAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) and PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A (PMJAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VRTVX having a 17.82% return and PMJAX slightly lower at 17.31%. Over the past 10 years, VRTVX has underperformed PMJAX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while PMJAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.


VRTVX

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.22%
YTD
17.82%
6M
19.19%
1Y
44.03%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
10.37%

PMJAX

1D
1.17%
1M
4.75%
YTD
17.31%
6M
16.94%
1Y
35.74%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTVX vs. PMJAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.82%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%
PMJAX
PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A
17.31%4.89%20.53%19.76%-5.07%38.48%6.52%19.76%-12.02%8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTVX and PMJAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.95

The correlation between VRTVX and PMJAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTVX vs. PMJAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PMJAX
PMJAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PMJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PMJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTVX vs. PMJAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) and PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A (PMJAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTVXPMJAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

2.07

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

2.94

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

4.45

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.17

13.27

+3.90

VRTVX vs. PMJAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the PMJAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTVX and PMJAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTVXPMJAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.07

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.25

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.39

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.40

+0.07

Drawdowns

VRTVX vs. PMJAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTVX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, smaller than the maximum PMJAX drawdown of -50.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTVX and PMJAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTVXPMJAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.98%

-50.53%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-7.66%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

-26.72%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-50.53%

+23.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.98%

-50.53%

+4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

0.00%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-17.04%

+9.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.57%

-0.06%

Volatility

VRTVX vs. PMJAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) and PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A (PMJAX) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTVXPMJAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.98%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

11.43%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

17.14%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

40.27%

-18.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

33.57%

-9.86%

VRTVX vs. PMJAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PMJAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRTVX vs. PMJAX - Dividend Comparison

VRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than PMJAX's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PMJAX
PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A
2.82%3.31%2.48%1.40%10.08%67.74%9.44%1.37%7.72%4.51%1.16%0.00%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.60%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VRTVX and PMJAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PMJAX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to VRTVX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTVX dropped -45.98% vs PMJAX's -50.53%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTVX and PMJAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer