PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTPX vs. FIKMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTPX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than FIKMX's 3.60% return.


VRTPX

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
8.00%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
2.05%
10Y*

FIKMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
3.60%
6M
4.00%
1Y
8.37%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
8.00%2.22%3.72%13.17%-26.14%40.37%-4.65%28.96%-2.80%
FIKMX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z
3.60%7.29%8.03%9.51%-14.48%19.04%-0.98%18.04%-1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTPX and FIKMX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.90

The correlation between VRTPX and FIKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTPX vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTPX
VRTPX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VRTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKMX
FIKMX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FIKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTPXFIKMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.39

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.42

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

10.52

-6.75

VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the FIKMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTPX and FIKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTPXFIKMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

2.05

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.58

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.55

-0.30

Drawdowns

VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTPX drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, which is greater than FIKMX's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTPX and FIKMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTPXFIKMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.33%

-34.49%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-3.43%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.19%

-7.16%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.35%

-18.04%

-16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-0.48%

-3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.40%

-5.15%

-6.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

0.79%

+1.85%

Volatility

VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.20%. This indicates that VRTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTPXFIKMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

1.20%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

3.10%

+6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

4.04%

+9.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

6.48%

+12.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

10.59%

+11.20%

VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison

VRTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than FIKMX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIKMX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z
4.67%4.80%4.81%5.15%6.24%1.59%4.90%5.82%2.31%0.00%
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
3.61%2.79%3.80%3.93%4.52%2.58%3.92%3.50%4.77%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTPX and FIKMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTPX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to FIKMX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTPX dropped -42.33% vs FIKMX's -34.49%.

FIKMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTPX and FIKMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer