VRTPX vs. FIKMX
VRTPX (Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund) and FIKMX (Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, VRTPX returned 2.05%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for FIKMX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VRTPX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FIKMX.
Performance
VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRTPX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than FIKMX's 3.60% return.
VRTPX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- —
FIKMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- —
VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund | 8.00% | 2.22% | 3.72% | 13.17% | -26.14% | 40.37% | -4.65% | 28.96% | -2.80% |
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 3.60% | 7.29% | 8.03% | 9.51% | -14.48% | 19.04% | -0.98% | 18.04% | -1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRTPX and FIKMX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VRTPX and FIKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRTPX vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank
VRTPX
FIKMX
VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRTPX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.39 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 2.42 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 10.52 | -6.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRTPX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 2.05 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.58 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.55 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRTPX drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, which is greater than FIKMX's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTPX and FIKMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRTPX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.33% | -34.49% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -3.43% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -7.16% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.35% | -18.04% | -16.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | -0.48% | -3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.40% | -5.15% | -6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 0.79% | +1.85% |
Volatility
VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.20%. This indicates that VRTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRTPX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 1.20% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | 3.10% | +6.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 4.04% | +9.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 6.48% | +12.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 10.59% | +11.20% |
VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRTPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRTPX vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison
VRTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than FIKMX's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 4.67% | 4.80% | 4.81% | 5.15% | 6.24% | 1.59% | 4.90% | 5.82% | 2.31% | 0.00% |
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.80% | 3.93% | 4.52% | 2.58% | 3.92% | 3.50% | 4.77% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRTPX and FIKMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRTPX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to FIKMX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTPX dropped -42.33% vs FIKMX's -34.49%.
FIKMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRTPX and FIKMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer